From Rome, for the Denzinger-Bergoglio
Psalm 50 (49) offers us the impressive reprimand of God the Father adverting the chosen, though unfaithful, people: “What right have you to recite my statutes, or take my covenant on your lips? For you hate discipline, and you cast my words behind you. If you see a thief, you are a friend of his; and you keep company with adulterers. You give your mouth free rein for evil, and your tongue frames deceit” (Ps 50:18-19). These words of the Psalmist, inspired by the Holy Spirit, come to mind in considering some of the latest news arriving from Rome.
Vatican profanation
The Sistine Chapel, considered by many as the greatest masterpiece of art in the Christian world, a sacred place where the sublime act of voting for the election of the Pontiffs takes place, has served as stage, not for an adulterer (something that doesn’t even raise an eyebrow these days) but rather for an open defender of “alternative marriage”, that is, homosexual unions. David Howell Evans — called “The Edge”, a member of the group U2 — was invited to sing in this symbolic place. We recall that: “As soon as their world tour had started in Vancouver, U2 declared their strong support for a ‘Yes’ vote in the referendum on marriage equality back home…during a performance of ‘Pride (In The Name of Love)’ in the US Airways Arena in Phoenix, AZ, on Saturday night, the singer said: ‘We have peace in Ireland today! And in fact on this very day we have true equality in Ireland’” (Bono hails ‘Yes’)
As the Psalm demonstrates, God rebukes the Jews who sought the company of the adulterers; today we could say something similar of those who permit and promote these kind of things…
The new video…
On the other hand, “The Pope video” has appeared for the month of May. Its title is: Respect for Woman. This video is presented as a means of spreading the intentions of the “Apostleship of Prayer.” If there is something that Francis doesn’t mention, it’s prayer; and even less, topics such as God, eternal salvation, grace and sin…without mentioning the commandments or things of the sort.
The phrases pronounced on the video, which do not appear to follow a coherent sequence, have the tone of a syndicalist diatribe; portraying what the French label as sensiblerie, and what we call without hesitation, “idiotic sentimentalism”. Let’s examine some of them: “We have done very little for the women who are in very difficult situations, despised, marginalized and even reduced to slavery.” Does this, “we have done”, refer to Jorge Bergoglio concretely, or some public in particular? Is it forgotten that the Church, through the continuous work of numerous masculine and feminine Religious Orders, has dedicated itself, and is currently dedicated to saving women from all of these situations? Who is it that has “done very little”? The upright Catholics who practice the Commandments, go to Mass and confession, and pray the Rosary?
Another slogan: “We must condemn sexual violence against women and remove the barriers that prevent their full integration into social, political and economic life.” This is a perfect dissertation for any presidential candidate, of the UNO, or an NGO. It’s politically correct. A socialist could easily make the same affirmation. Is this what millions of Catholics hoped for from the Bishop of Rome? Nothing more?
“If you think this is clearly right, join my petition” Besides the colloquial Argentinian turn of phrase used by the pontiff in Spanish, (albeit not generally accepted by worldwide Spanish speakers) this phrase isn’t very coherent. And even less so, the following “Prayer intention”: “that in all countries of the world women may be honored, and respected and valued for their essential contribution to society.”
What exactly does this term imply? “Contribution to society”? When we hear this kind of talk from any politician, we already know that it means: feminism, abortion, gender equality, etc. What does Francis understand by the term “contribution to society”? The affirmation of Saint Paul to the Galatians: “For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free person, there is not male and female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Gal 3:27-28) refers to the action of grace in souls; but the action of the Holy Spirit does not annul the differences between Greeks and Jews, between Germans and Turks, between men and woman. On the other hand, we would like to ask Francis if he intends to speak of this topic with the Muslim immigrants that he wants to bring to Europe, since this issue regarding woman is mainly a problem in the Arab world. Or is it not politically correct to bring up this topic in their milieu? The problems the Bishop of Rome refers to really do exist in our XXI century (sexual violence, difficulties of social insertion, people — men and woman — who are despised, marginalized or reduced to slavery). But let’s remind the shepherd that instead of protecting his sheep from the wolves, he is merely dedicating his efforts to flapping away the flies that bother them.
These are Bergoglio’s “prayer intentions” while the wolves of generalized adultery (speaking solely of the problems of women) of abortion, of endorsed contraception, of ravaging immorality, destroy the flock; the wolves of the lack of faith, absence of baptism and other sacraments, relativism in the practice of the sacrament of confession, lack of catechists — topics which are avoided more than leprosy itself — degrade the People of God, redeemed by the Sacrifice of Calvary.
And this is the video that Francis gifts Catholics with in May, the month of Mary…That’s right. May, Mary, woman. What could be better than using the month of Mary to encourage “women’s rights” Francis had pondered. We are already aware that these monthly intentions are “universal”, for everyone. In reality, rather than “intentions” they are “programs” of conduct, ethical guidelines that fit in with any religion or “god” as we have already analyzed in the previous videos (see here and here)
Faced with this situation, we end with the same Psalm 50 (49) found at the beginning of the article.
But to the wicked God says: “What right have you to recite my statutes, or take my covenant on your lips?
For you hate discipline, and you cast my words behind you.
If you see a thief, you are a friend of his; and you keep company with adulterers.
You give your mouth free rein for evil, and your tongue frames deceit.
You sit and speak against your brother; you slander your own mother’s son.
These things you have done and I have been silent; you thought that I was one like yourself. But now I rebuke you, and lay the charge before you.
Mark this, then, you who forget God, lest I rend, and there be none to deliver!
He who brings thanksgiving as his sacrifice honors me; to him who orders his way aright I will show the salvation of God!
(Ps 50: 16-23)
Note of the Denzinger-Bergoglio:
Perhaps Francis, speaking against feminine discrimination, is giving support to feminist movements and current populism around the world:
These commentators give great hope to this commentator that now the ordinary Catholic unaware that anything is awry in the Church will realize what is awry and why it is awry. Great lay leaders, internationally communicative, are emerging to tell it like it is, as I am sure the priestly compilers of this humdinger of a Denzinger/Bergoglio site wish.
Pope Francis’s “Prayer intention”: “that in all countries of the world women may be honored, and respected and valued for their essential contribution to society.”
If he were to have said “that in all countries of the world OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST, who is truly GODA may be honored, and respected and valued for having died to save us from our sins”
THAT would have been the statement worthy of someone holding the supreme honour of being Christ’s Vicar on earth.
Now Francis, forget women’s rights, remember, instead that Christ came to show us the image of the Father.
THIS is whom Our Lord TRULY is…
Exodus 19
. [10] And He (The Lord) said to him:
“Go to the people, and sanctify them today, and tomorrow, and let them wash their garments. 11] And let them be ready against the third day: for on the third day the Lord will come down in the sight of all the people upon mount Sinai. [12] And thou shalt appoint certain limits to the people round about, (Altar Rails) and thou shalt say to them: “Take heed you go not up into the mount, and that ye touch not the borders thereof: every one that toucheth the mount dying he shall die. [13] No hands shall touch him, but he shall be stoned to death, or shall be shot through with arrows: whether it be beast, or man, he shall not live. When the trumpet shall begin to sound, then let them go up into the mount.”
[14] And Moses came down from the mount to the people, and sanctified them. And when they had washed their garments, [15] He said to them: Be ready against the third day, and come not near your wives……..(Celibacy has ALWAYS been the norm of ministery to the Lord…..later on, during the time of the Old Covenant, there was such a large surplus of Priests to serve in the Temple, that only occasionally was a Priest given permission to serve. DURING THE TIME OF HIS MINISTRY, THE PRIEST WAS PLACED UNDER THE LAW OF CELIBACY. )
Against unconsecrated souls ascending the steps of Our Lord’s Sanctuary where only his Priesthood should go.
Moses spoke, and God answered him. [20] And the Lord came down upon mount Sinai, in the very top of the mount, and he called Moses unto the top thereof. And when he was gone up thither,
[21] He said unto him:
“Go down, and charge the people: lest they should have a mind to pass the limits to see the Lord, and a very great multitude of them should perish. [22] The Priests also that come to the Lord, let them be sanctified, lest he strike them.”
[23] And Moses said to the Lord:
“The people cannot come up to mount Sinai: for Thou did charge, and command, saying: “Set limits about the mount, (Altar Rails) and sanctify it.” [24] And the Lord said to him:
“Go, get thee down: and thou shalt come up, thou and Aaron with thee: but let not the Priests and the people pass the limits, nor come up to the Lord, lest he kill them.”
[25] And Moses went down to the people and told them all.
http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=2&ch=19&l=22#x
Against none-Catholics receiving Holy Communion
Leviticus 22:10
No stranger shall eat of the sanctified things: a sojourner of the Priests, or a hired servant, shall not eat of them.
Numbers 18:7
But thou and thy sons look ye to the priesthood: and all things that pertain to the service of the altar, and that are within the veil, shall be executed by the priests. If any stranger shall approach, he shall be slain.
Deuteronomy 18:1
The priests and Levites, and all that are of the same tribe, shall have no part nor inheritance with the rest of Israel, because they shall eat the sacrifices of the Lord, and his oblations,
Against Princes who evolve Doctrinal changes in Christ’s Name.
Jeremias (Jeremiah) 5:31
The prophets prophesied falsehood, and the priests clapped their hands: and my people loved such things: what then shall be done in the end thereof?
This is how WE are today
Second Book Of Esdras (Nehemiah) Chapter 9
33 Thou art just in all things that have come upon us: because thou hast done truth, but we have done wickedly. [34] Our kings, our princes, our Priests, and our fathers have not kept Thy law, and have not minded Thy Commandments, and Thy testimonies which Thou hast testified among them. [35] And they have not served Thee in their kingdoms, and in Thy manifold goodness, which Thou gavest them, and in the large and fat land, which Thou deliveredst before them, nor did they return from their most wicked devices.
[36] Behold we ourselves this day are bondmen: and the land, which thou gavest our fathers, to eat the bread thereof, and the good things thereof, and we ourselves are servants in it. [37] And the fruits thereof grow up for the kings, whom Thou hast set over us for our sins, and they have dominion over our bodies, and over our beasts, according to their will, and we are in great tribulation.
http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=16&ch=9&l=34#x
and….
2 Paralipomenon (2 Chronicles) Chapter 36
14.. all the chief of the priests, and the people wickedly transgressed according to all the abominations of the Gentiles: and they defiled the house of the Lord, which he had sanctified to himself in Jerusalem. [15] And the Lord the God of their fathers sent to them, by the hand of his messengers, rising early, and daily admonishing them: because he spared his people and his dwelling place.
[16] But they mocked the messengers of God, and despised his words, and misused the prophets, until the wrath of the Lord arose against his people, and there was no remedy.
http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=14&ch=36&l=14#x
Prophecy Of Ezechiel Chapter 22
Our Lord places TRUE Reverence and Piety in the Holy Places ABOVE Charity.
[26] Her priests have despised My law, and have defiled My Sanctuaries: they have put no difference between Holy and profane: nor have distinguished between the polluted and the clean: and they have turned away their eyes from My Sabbaths, and I was profaned in the midst of them. [27] Her princes in the midst of her, are like wolves ravening the prey to shed blood, and to destroy souls, and to run after gains through covetousness. [28] And her prophets have daubed them without tempering the mortar, seeing vain things, and divining lies unto them, saying: “Thus saith the Lord God:” when the Lord hath not spoken. [29] The people of the land have used oppression, and committed robbery: they afflicted the needy and poor, and they oppressed the stranger by calumny without judgment. [30] And I sought among them for a man that might set up a hedge, and stand in the gap before me in favour of the land, that I might not destroy it: and I found none.
[31] And I poured out my indignation upon them, in the fire of my wrath I consumed them: I have rendered their way upon their own head, saith the Lord God.
http://www.drbo.org/x/d?b=drb&bk=31&ch=22&l=26#x
THIS is the TRUE God, Heathenised Priests of the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Which one are YOU serving?
Not only do i think he is mysogynist; but at heart he is a mysanthrope. The sorrow and continued suffering of the Franciscans of the Immaculate certainly attest to his harshness and lack of mercy.
His remarks calculated to shock, confuse, anger and even drive to dispair Catholics who strive to live good and Holy lives. His pointed rejection of Christians whilst at the same time seeming to care so much for everyone else. His public sorrow over the martyrdom of Christians contrasted with his rescue of none from Lesbos.
And to top it off his public commitment to “celebrate ” the reformation on Oct 31, thereby celebrating the “divorce” of our holy mother, the church from so many of her children, and the cruel martyrdom of thousands of priests, brothers, nuns, and simply lay persons , including those brave Jesuits in the England who risked everything to bring communion and mass to the bereft in that land and paid for it by being litterally pulled into four quarters by horses.
The admonitions to and vicious name calling of those he despises. The almost sycophantic attitude to anyone who by their lifestyle makes a mockery of the Church’s teaching and guidance.
The nonsense he uttered at the close of World Youth day in calling all the youth to pray with him to God to make it so that what was considered wrong , would no longer be wrong..
His continued insistence on God’ desire ,not to bring us into a state of grace, but suddenly after 21 centuries , to “surprise ” us by being in contradiction with Himself ..
The Living God as a novelty act!
His patently false statements to youth about not needing to attend mass. His rejection of Christ’s commission to spread the good news and make believers of the world, by lying to non-Christians in telling them that we all worship the same God.
His mis-representation of Jesus mercy as something given without Our Lord’s straightforward -no nonsense request to “sin no more”. A mercy that in effect requires no change of behaviour and no repentance.( Which if one thinks about it, is quite ridiculous, because the perfectly holy are NOT in need of any mercy.), and in so doing to leads so many many people toward damnation because it justifies them in their sinful actions..
There is more, but I have said enough. Our Lord told us to pray for our enemies, he didn’t mention anything about having to like them. Therefore and most especially since this particular enemy is an ordained priest, we must pray hard and even make sacrifices for him and his “gang” of priests for love of Jesus.
The possibility of a priest lost to heaven is a terrible terrible wound to Jesus’ already wounded heart and an horrific victory for the devil, our real and eternal enemy.
This is long post, I do hope it ‘s cogent and not rambling. Thank you to everyone kind enough to read it. It mattered a lot to me to share this heavy weight.
And in doing so I have been able to clarify what I must do in addition to speaking out… ( the prayer and sacrifice to which I refer .
Cheers
Dear Blossom, thank YOU for sharing your heavy weight. You have just done what hundreds, perhaps thousands, of us catholic women and men would love to do. May God bless you!
And yes, it is cogent and not rambling. The confusion that stems from the daily dose Francis’ rot is no small issue.
A big hug, my dear. Keep up he faith. God will not let us feel abandoned for long.
Inspired. You are a dear sister in Christ.
Inspired by the Holy Spirit, Blossom.
Beautifully said. Got bless you abundantly.
St Michael defend us in battle.
“…that in all countries of the world women may be honored, and respected and valued for their essential contribution to society.” …What exactly does this term imply? “Contribution to society”?”
First, it is condescending. He’s a sick man with a becoming ever-moreso-daily thinly veiled dislike of women. Maybe it’s because of his obvious infatuation with Gaia, and women are the ones, via breeding like rabbits, that are sullying his beloved Gaia–which brings me to my other point–to make a statement as stupid as “contribution to” implies he must have considered the opposite–that women are not contributors, only takers and polluters. At best, it implies second class status.
His words “contribution to” are typical communist jargon. For communists, only those who produce material goods deserve to live.
Sick is the word. Emotionally, psychologically, spiritually, doctrinally, morally. He is a VERY sick man. Cannot possibly be the Pope.
His dislike for women is because he is queer. That’s why he always supports their queer organizations.
As usual, as a woman and a child of God, I’m disgusted. There are so many things to object to. Here’s one: I am not worthy because of my contribution to society. I am worthy because of my intrinsic value as a human being; a unique soul made and loved by God My Father for His Glory. Around the same time as this, he opens the commission to investigate women deacons. Everything he does is like the feminist movement, sounding for women but in actuality is a violent destruction of their intrinsic worth and nature. He does not even respect the Most Holy, Pure and Faith-filled Mother of God. Evidenced by his sad and traitorous portrayal of her supposedly thinking “Lies” at the foot of the Cross. Yet another prophecy fulfilled as the Blessed Virgin Mary is ignored & cast aside. The same Mother that the Apostles loved, respected and honoured so much.
No less inspired.